<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AirScape Engineer&#039;s Blog &#187; efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/category/efficiency/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com</link>
	<description>All About Whole House Fans + bonus opinions on energy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Solar Loves Whole House Fans</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/solar-loves-whole-house-fans</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/solar-loves-whole-house-fans#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whole House Fan Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy calcuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=1693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, solar SHOULD love whole house fans. We'll explain why.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are a couple of trends that will affect solar photovoltaic installations:</p>
<ul>
<li>Newer electrical rate structures encourage conservation (tiered rates)</li>
<li>&#8216;Energy Security&#8217; is a powerful motivator</li>
<li>Photovoltaic rebates require house efficiency check-ups</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/07/solar-loves-whf2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1724" title="solar-loves-whf" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/07/solar-loves-whf2.jpg" alt="" width="595" height="400" /></a>We think  solar energy gathering is great. The idea of  getting electricity essentially for  free energy has certainly captivated our imaginations. Even though the cost of photovoltaic panels is dropping very quickly, the investment is still considerable.  Our crystal ball tells us that electrical energy is very, very versatile and will be in demand as electrical cars come on stream and coal fired electrical power plants start to show their ugly side. (coal burning)</p>
<p>As the demand for clean electrical energy increases, its value will certainly not go down.   In fact, if the validity of predicting cheap energy such as the famous line is any guide <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Strauss">&#8220;too cheap to meter&#8221;</a>,then we should get prepared for high prices.</p>
<p>By combining whole house fans solar contractors and  homeowners  can:</p>
<ul>
<li>Decrease the initial investment in PV panels</li>
<li>AND/ OR</li>
<li>Increase the  Return on Investment for the entire system</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/solar-loves-whole-house-fans/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If you are considering a heat pump</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/if-you-are-considering-a-heat-pump</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/if-you-are-considering-a-heat-pump#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2010 16:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy calcuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=1668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[discussion of an article on heat pump efficiency]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/07/heatpump-schematic-595.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1678" title="heatpump-schematic-595" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/07/heatpump-schematic-595.jpg" alt="" width="592" height="325" /></a></p>
<p>This <a href="http://www.finehomebuilding.com/departments/taking-issue/heat-pump-schmeat-pump.aspx" target="_blank">article </a>by <a href="http://www.energysavingsscience.com" target="_blank">Henry Gifford</a>, an energy saving specialist discusses why heat pumps are no panacea.  His points, well made, bring home the messages that building envelope efficiency is critical and the importance of examining the entire energy chain -  from power house to your house.  Not that readers of this blog need reminding, but Henry also points out that over half of this country&#8217;s electricity derives from coal burning . (BTW clean coal = oxymoron du jour)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.energysavingscience.com" target="_blank"><cite>www.energysavingscience.com/</cite></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.finehomebuilding.com/departments/taking-issue/heat-pump-schmeat-pump.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.finehomebuilding.com/departments/taking-issue/heat-pump-schmeat-pump.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/if-you-are-considering-a-heat-pump/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>4.4e WHF ships</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/4-4e-whf-ships</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/4-4e-whf-ships#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 22:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whole House Fan Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=1653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re happy to announce that the 4.4e WHF is currently in stock and we&#8217;re moving product out the door. What makes this an &#8220;e&#8221; ?  The motor is an ECM (electronically commutated motor) which when matched up with the efficient blade design gives a great power profile and low noise. See the details here: http://airscapefans.com/products/Shop/Natural-Cooling/Whole-House-Fans/AirScape-4.4e-WHF [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/06/4.4e-fan-damper-595.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1655" title="4.4e-fan-damper-595" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/06/4.4e-fan-damper-595.jpg" alt="" width="595" height="553" /></a>We&#8217;re happy to announce that the 4.4e WHF is currently in stock and we&#8217;re moving product out the door.</p>
<p>What makes this an &#8220;e&#8221; ?  The motor is an ECM (electronically commutated motor) which when matched up with the efficient blade design gives a great power profile and low noise.</p>
<p>See the details here: <a href="http://airscapefans.com/products/Shop/Natural-Cooling/Whole-House-Fans/AirScape-4.4e-WHF" target="_parent">http://airscapefans.com/products/Shop/Natural-Cooling/Whole-House-Fans/AirScape-4.4e-WHF</a></p>
<p>The following graph shows the energy use profile of the 4.4e as compared to the theoretical efficiency of a fan system.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/06/fan-unloading-595.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1666" title="fan-unloading-595" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/06/fan-unloading-595.jpg" alt="" width="595" height="406" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/4-4e-whf-ships/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Railways should be open sourced.</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/railways-should-be-open-sourced</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/railways-should-be-open-sourced#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 21:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[highway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[railway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What is an open source railway, and how will that make a better country?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2009/11/train1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1592" title="train1" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2009/11/train1.jpg" alt="" width="600" height="222" /></a></p>
<p>Even though railroads are much more energy efficient and deliver lower transportation costs without federal subsidies, why are trucks the preferred mode of transportation?</p>
<p>I think that the answer lies in the fact that the highway truck combination is effectively open source.  The term <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source">open source</a> is commonly used in the software world, but it applies here as well.</p>
<p>The platform is a highway, which just about anybody can use, provided they obey rules for weight, size, and safety of their modules (trucks in this case). This gives a tremendous amount of freedom to truckers and shippers to control their own destiny.  Ask anybody who has used the railroads for shipping and you will see that a rigid central planning department controls how and when your freight arrives.</p>
<p>How about this for an idea. Let&#8217;s make the railroads into a regulated monopoly. (It works for electricity, water, and gas BTW). The railroad makes its income by maintaining the infrastructure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/railways-should-be-open-sourced/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heat Flow</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/heat-flow</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/heat-flow#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 21:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy calcuations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=1512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is an overview on the basics of heat transfer through building materials. It's of particular interest to our customers ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/05/plate-small.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1517" title="plate-small" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/05/plate-small.jpg" alt="" width="575" height="355" /></a></p>
<p>We get a lot of questions about the &#8216;R value&#8217; of our damper doors, so we felt that it&#8217;s worth going over the basics.</p>
<p>The so called &#8216;R value&#8217; is denominated in  the units of (square-feet x degree x hour/ BTU). Sounds complicated, but all you really need to know is:</p>
<p>Heat Flow  Q (in BTU per hour) = Area x (temperature differential) / R-value</p>
<p>[For you techies, this formula is valid for steady state, and assumes an infinite plane area.]</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s do the math for our whole house fan dampers.  We&#8217;ll assume VERY cold conditions in the attic (0° F) and 70° F inside.</p>
<table style="margin:5px 5px 5px;" border="1" cellspacing="1" width="534" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="84" height="41" align="CENTER"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Model</span></strong></td>
<td width="84" align="CENTER"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">length </span></strong></td>
<td width="84" align="CENTER"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">width</span></strong></td>
<td width="115" align="CENTER"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Area (sq. feet)</span></strong></td>
<td width="84" align="CENTER"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">R value</span></strong></td>
<td width="84" align="CENTER"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">Q (BTUH)</span></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="16" align="CENTER">1.0WHF</td>
<td align="CENTER">22.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">14.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">2.27</td>
<td align="CENTER">14</td>
<td align="CENTER">11.33</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="16" align="CENTER">1.7WHF</td>
<td align="CENTER">22.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">14.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">2.27</td>
<td align="CENTER">7</td>
<td align="CENTER">22.66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="16" align="CENTER">2.5, 2.5eWHF</td>
<td align="CENTER">22.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">14.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">2.27</td>
<td align="CENTER">10</td>
<td align="CENTER">15.86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td height="16" align="CENTER">4.5WHF</td>
<td align="CENTER">26.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">22.5</td>
<td align="CENTER">4.14</td>
<td align="CENTER">10</td>
<td align="CENTER">28.98</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Bottom line:  There is not much heat loss through a well insulated whole house fan damper door.  The question that you SHOULD be asking is: &#8220;How well sealed is the whole house fan damper door?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most residential windows will have R values of 1 to 3. Another question that we get all the time is : &#8220;What is a BTU ?&#8221;</p>
<p>BTU stands for British Thermal Unit.</p>
<p>1 BTU is approximately the energy released by burning 1 paper match.</p>
<p>100,000 BTU&#8217;s make up one therm &#8211; that&#8217;s how you purchase natural gas, and right now that costs about $1.50</p>
<p>A gallon of gas has about 114,000 BTU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/heat-flow/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>European Observations</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/european-observations</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/european-observations#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AirScape-travels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=1475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the interesting things about Europe is the way they blend new technology with an ancient built environment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/03/europe1.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-1474" title="europe1" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//2010/03/europe1.jpg" alt="" width="478" height="719" /></a>The picture at right represents some of the contrasts that  we observed on our recent trip to Europe. Outside of the room, you can see a building that is anywhere from 100 to 300 years old. Every window has shutters which have been used for years to keep noise and light out.</p>
<p>In contrast our hotel room (and every hotel room we stayed in) was equipped with modern windows that make North American models look primitive. As expected, the windows open along the vertical hinge, but the cool feature is that with the twist of the handle, they can be made to tilt open leaving a secure ventilation gap at the top.  When closed, the window seals  like an airplane door, which makes for almost zero air leakage.  The good seal was  further appreciated, considering that the street is about 2 feet from the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/european-observations/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When you have a hammer&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/when-you-have-a-hammer</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/when-you-have-a-hammer#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy Production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=1233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Another appropriate aphorism. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;When you have a hammer, everything looks like a nail&#8221;</p>
<p>What a wonderfully simple way to describe much of our world.  I am reminded of this whenever I see people working on the &#8220;energy&#8221; problem.  Software people clearly know, that if only we wired everything up and monitored our energy use, the rest of the problem would be trivial.  Economists clearly have the upper hand, because they can describe carbon trading as the sure fire method to reduce carbon output,  increase energy efficiency, and still have economic growth.  Photovoltaic manufacturers, electric car builders, and wind farm developers are among the many queuing up at the public feeding trough.</p>
<p>Nothing wrong with any of those solutions.  Just bear in mind the aphorism.</p>
<p>By the way, our hammer is a whole house fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/when-you-have-a-hammer/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Foam Recycling Program</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/foam-recycling-program</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/foam-recycling-program#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nicole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a manufacturer of environmentally friendly products, it is always our goal to find new ways to be even more green in our business practices. In January 2009 we decided to implement a foam packaging recycling program to help reduce our environmental impact.  In order to ensure that our fans reach customers throughout the country [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small">As a manufacturer of environmentally friendly products, it is always our goal to find new ways to be even more green in our business practices. In January 2009 we decided to implement a foam packaging recycling program to help reduce our environmental impact. <img class="alignright size-medium wp-image-684" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//Packaging_reduced-300x270.jpg" alt="Packaging_reduced" width="300" height="270" /></span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small"><br />
</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small">In order to ensure that our fans reach customers throughout the country without damage, they require robust polyethylene foam packaging. Polyethylene is a highly elastic and strong plastic that can withstand multiple impacts, making it ideal for shipping heavy objects such as whole house fans. Unfortunately, both the production and disposal of polyethylene, like all plastics, causes serious damage to the environment. In many parts of the country polyethylene foam is difficult if not impossible to recycle, so most of it ends up in a landfill. </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small"><br />
</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small">The only way to reduce the hazards of plastic is to reduce the production of new plastic products. This is done by both decreasing overall demand and increasing the recycling of plastic. Our program allows us to reduce our need for the production of new polyethylene and also reduce the total amount of plastic being thrown away. We reuse the foam as many times as we can and then we recycle it, ensuring that the foam returned to us does not end up in a landfill. </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small"><br />
</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small"> </span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small">It is immensely satisfying to us that we have had great customer response to this program. Almost 1 yearÂ  into the program and we have an average return rate of 42%, and the numbers are constantly increasing! My personal goal is to achieve a 50% return rate by next Spring, and with the return rates always increasing, I believe we can easily achieve this goal.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small"><br />
</span>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><span style="font-size: small">We owe a big thank you to all of our customers who have supported this program. We would also like to send out a hearty thanks to UPS, who has kindly begun waiving label printing fees and also begun offering us a discount on our return packages. With the help of UPS, our foam recycling program has been made more financially viable for us to continue in the future.</span></p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0in"><!-- 		@page { margin: 0.79in } 		P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/foam-recycling-program/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is this the best stimulus we could think of</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/is-this-the-best-stimulus-we-could-think-of</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/is-this-the-best-stimulus-we-could-think-of#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[houses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That $8,000 we paid people to buy houses. Hmmmm......]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our government program to encourage home buying is coming to a close.  Was it as good idea ? Certainly, it was for real estate agents! At least with the &#8220;cash for clunkers&#8221; program, the country as a whole (possibly) benefited by encouraging production of new, efficient cars and the retirement of low MPG cars.</p>
<p>Why didn&#8217;t we do the same thing for houses ?  OK, not the same thing, but how about this idea (in case we&#8217;re crazy enough to exend it):  Pay out the $8,000 directly to buyers of newly built homes.  For buyers of used houses, put the cash towards sealing, and insulating, and generally making the old house efficient.  Either way, contractors and their employees are working.</p>
<p>I will name this complicated economic concept &#8220;Have something left after the party&#8217;s over&#8221; , with the other very, very complicated concept (especially not  understood by bankers) &#8220;Spread the wealth&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/is-this-the-best-stimulus-we-could-think-of/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White Paper: CO2 Reduction Using Whole House Fans</title>
		<link>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/white-paper-co2-reduction-using-whole-house-fans</link>
		<comments>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/white-paper-co2-reduction-using-whole-house-fans#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>neil</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Whole House Fan Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy saving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[white paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.airscapefans.com/?p=334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you're reading this blog, you're probably one of the converted. Please pass this white paper on to (anybody), but especially the movers and shakers who make policy (and give out rebates).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads/co2-white-paper-9-09.pdf"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-337" title="whitepaper" src="http://blog.airscapefans.com/wp-content/uploads//whitepaper1.png" alt="whitepaper" width="600" height="390" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.airscapefans.com/archives/white-paper-co2-reduction-using-whole-house-fans/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
