Since energy is a topic of conversation in our office, and I have been doing some bicycle commuting, it suddenly became important to have a table of transportation energy use.
Mode | kW-h/km | kcal/mile | Miles/gallon | kW-h/mile | beer-pints/mile |
Bicycle | 0.0361 | 50 | 629 | 0.058 | 0.23 |
747 | 0.2521 | 350 | 90 | 0.407 | 1.59 |
Electric Car | 0.1550 | 215 | 146 | 0.250 | 0.98 |
SUV | 1.5128 | 2098 | 15 | 2.440 | 9.54 |
Train | 0.0820 | 114 | 277 | 0.132 | 0.52 |
Conclusions:
- Bicycle wins the efficiency contest.
- Electric car could win the efficiency contest if you fit 5+ people in your car.
- Escalating that war, the tandem would probably be the next weapon of choice.
- Trains are pretty good (no surprise), and perhaps could get better with regenerative braking.
Assumptions:
- Bicycle uses 50 kcal/mile
- 747 90 mpg (FAA figure is lower,but…)
- Electric car: .25 kwh/mile (from Tesla if you trust software ‘geniuses’ posing as a car company, or if you trust the old fashioned car company GM, their ‘Volt’ appears to be .34 kW-h/mile)
- <rant> Tesla presents data like a software vendor (no surprise). Their claim a 70amp @220 volt charger, running for 3.5 hours charges the battery fully (capacity listed as 55kw-h). Energy = efficiency (always less than 1.0) x 70 x 220 x 3.5 = 53.9. Clearly credibility = 1/ efficiency </rant>
- SUV 15 mpg
- Train (swiss) .082kwh/passenger-mile
- Pint of beer has 220 kcal
- kcal (kilocalories) are the kind we eat (aka Calories with a big ‘C’) Yep, our system of measurement is THAT stupid. Small calories x1000 = Calories = kilocalories.
Conversion Notes:
- It’s assumed that all liquid fuels have the same energy content as gasoline: 36.6 kwh/ gallon.
- Liquid fuels have crappy energy conversion, unlike electricity which can be 100% efficient.